0

Aloe Blacc – Wake Me Up l Immigration

Aloe Blacc, the vocalist to Avicii’s “Wake me up”, did a second video to the “Wake me up” single. This video is wonderful to say the least. The video was “Inspired by 11 million true stories” referring to the 11 million undocumented immigrants currently in the United States. The story starts with a face off between a police officer and a protester. It then does a flashback to a day laborer working the US and then a mexican mother illegally crossing the US border with her child. The mother and child are caught by a border patrol officer, the same one from the face off. The patrol officer has an emotional moment with the child but they are still sent back. We find out that the child is the daughter of the laborer and we watch her grow. She crosses the border, reunites with her father, and becomes an activist for immigration. Back at the face off we realize that the activist facing off with the patrol officer is the same girl. It is a wonderful and humanizing representation of the struggle that many of these 11 million immigrants have had to face. Kudos to Aloe Blacc for bringing this representation in his music video. If you like this video check out Afterlife by Arcade Fire. It gives an unapologetic representation of a working class Hispanic family in the US. Citing the complex relationships between a first generation son and his immigrant father. The video also shows complexity and nuances of both the father and the son giving a very humanizing representation that we do not often see in mainstream media.

0

Tom Daley

Tom Daley

Linked is fellow blogger Velociriot’s blog post titled “Tom Daley dating a dude doesn’t mean he’s gay.” I think this is a relevant read as it questions some of the ideas we have on the gay label. The article talks about how immediately after his “Something I want to say” video there were several people and major media outlets began to label the British Diver as Gay. Even though the Daley specifically stated that he “still fancied girls.” Regardless of his word media outlets immediately began the branding the gay label on Daley. There were also various conversations on twitter about how obvious it was. Showing just how much society still believes in stereotypes.

0

Rebelle and Gender Norms

Graham Slaughter recently wrote an article about the rise in popularity of Archery, especially among young girls. Slaughter cites the case in Toronto where demand is surpassing supply causing a long waiting list of people who want to learn archery. Slaughter writes that the obvious cause of this surge in popularity is the Catching Fire film. Anyone that has seen the film will know that it did an excellent job of showcasing Katniss’, played by Jennifer Lawrence, archery skills.

It is no surprise as often times before fictional characters have inspired people to take up archery. Slaughter cites Legolas from The Lord Of The Rings and Hawkeye from The Avengers . This is an important testament to the very real effects that popular culture has on our society. An important argument as to why representation does matter. Anyway, there is an obvious difference this time around and that is gender. Katniss is a female and her archery skills are a well done representation of an athletic, fierce, and powerful woman. Katniss’ character has inspired girls to be more sportys and companies are taking advantage.

Although, some of these companies want to very blatantly remind the girls of gender norms. Hasbro’s Nerf has launched “Rebelle,” the name alone is exclusive to the female gender. This blog posts by EW sums up the product very well saying “Rebelle, will feature projectiles that have the same power as the top items in the brand’s Nerf Elite line — but come wrapped in a prettier package and designed to encourage the collaborative play Hasbro has found girls prefer. Aspiring Princess Meridas and Katniss Everdeens can own the first Rebelle product — called the Heartbreaker bow — this fall.” Hasbro is placing a gender on these toys. It is problematic but nothing new.  

It is quite exciting to see that young female characters, who were never reduced to their gender, are actually having an impact on young women. So it is also quite sad to see companies take this positivity and reduce it to a pretty and pink Heartbreaker bow.

0

Hard Out Here

I have to tell you how much I love Lilly Allen’s Hard Out Here. I have had this song on repeat all week and it is not even getting old. The lyrics are the main reason I love the song. As many of you probably already know the lyrics are trying to be feminist. The song confronts head on gender roles, body issues, and misogyny.With lyrics like “There’s a glass ceiling to break, uh-huh, there’s money to make,” “Sometimes it’s hard to find the words to say/I’ll go ahead and say them anyway/Forget your balls and grow a pair of tits,” and “Inequality promises that it’s here to stay/Always trust the injustice ’cause it’s not going away.” It’s very difficult to not sing along.

The song has gotten a lot of attention. Jezebel writer Kate Dries has called it a “feminist pop anthem.” While Salon writer Prachi Gupta seems to hate it specifically saying the opposite and that the video “fails as a satire”. Dries argues that the lyrics is feminist and that yes the objectification of black women is racist but gives it a pass because it is satire. Gupta says that the video fails as a satire because the exaggerations it uses are not different enough from the representations of what already goes on in music videos. I personally find this argument flawed because the exaggerations were pretty bad, in my opinion. Also even if one does not find it over the top you can’t really say that it’s a failure as satire is just meant to make fun of the situation.

There is a stronger argument for racism; however, the argument is derived from Nolan Feeney who makes a good point that when looking at roles in the music videos the dancers remain separate from Allen because their portrayal as sexual objects never ends while Allen’s does. Allen has answered some of these arguments and it doesn’t seem like she took nearly as much thought into the video as some might think. I say this because she took to twitter and said that she had never asked for specific ethnicities and that the video had nothing to do with race. Which pretty much destroys the satire defense because satire must be intentional and since she had no intention of making the video about race people can not defend her against racist claims by saying it was satire. This is upsetting because the lyrics of the song are fantastic but it is obvious that someone, not necessarily Allen, was in the end just trying to copy the trend of using black female dancer to look edgy. Instead of using them for intentional satire.

There is racism here yes but Gupta goes further by saying it is “sexist shit” because of it’s failure as a satire to exaggerate enough. Again, personally I see the scenes as substantially exaggerated. I mean the crotch grabbing, twerking, hand licking, banana, champagne being poured on a dancer as she twerks. It is quite bad and there’s no real argument as to why it’s not effective enough to separate the Hard Out Here video from other videos that do it seriously. I think that part is up to personal opinion and interpretation. Personally, I don’t find it sexist so I will continue to sing along but I will stay away from the video and its racism.

0

Capitol Couture

Catching Fire, the latest in The Hunger Games series, was released on Friday November 22nd. I have been a fan of the series since the release of the first book in 2008 and I thoroughly enjoyed the movie. I enjoy the book and movie for various reasons but very much so for it’s political and social satire. I think we should not forget that The Hunger Games series is full of criticism for things like the media, celebrity culture, fashion, upper class, ruling class, and several other important concepts. Though some have forgotten or maybe just chose to ignore the critical roots of the Hunger Games series. Some like CoverGirl and Net-A-Porter have used the satirical exaggerations of the Hunger Games to campaign their products.

This is Capitol Couture: 

Image

Campaigns by CoverGirl and Net-A-Porter that completely miss the point of The Hunger Games. 

Let’s talk about something very critical to The Hunger Games. Its criticism of class inequality and the superficial values of the upper class. Now first of all neither Suzanne Collins or the movie openly show their criticisms. The reader/viewer must be paying attention in order to pick up on them but it’s not very hard. The most obvious is the fashion of the Capitol society. Take Effie for example:

 

Effie is the embodiment of Capitol society. Take a look at her fashion. Her hair is always stiff, exaggerated, and ornate. Her skin tone is always paper white and her make up detailed, colorful, and made to match her outfit. The clothes are alway exaggerated, stiff, colorful, and never repeated. Her upper class status is so obvious. She has never been expected to do any difficult work therefore has the ability to wear stiff and ornate clothes that practically speaking are not for those who work. The detail in makeup, ornate decoration, and matching shows how easy and void of work her life is. The same with her light skin. It is probably fashionable to have pale skin to show others how little they have to work out in the sun.  

Cough *boy does that look familiar, covergirl* cough

Now look at the decadence of the wealthy. If you have seen the movie you might recall the party scene at the presidential palace. In one instance Peeta is offered food from some people of the capitol, he responds by saying he has had enough and they offer him a liquid bottle that makes him vomit. Peeta is surprised and asks them why he would want to vomit. They respond with something along the lines of how else could you try everything. Decadence is so important in Capitol society that no one is allowed to have enough. There is no limit or satisfaction to the consumption of the wealthy.

 

Contrast these details with the lives of the people of the districts. In the GIF of Effie, above, you can see the practical, plain, and worn out clothes of the people from the districts. These are the clothes of working people. These are working people who starve. Katniss for example has had to hunt for game to feed her family and keep them alive. The ability to submit your name multiple times for the reaping in order to get meager amounts of extra food, or the tesserae, is further proof of the poverty that the districts live in. There exist a wide gap between the wealthy capitol and the districts yet it is one country. These two pictures of wealth and poverty are clear criticism of class inequality.

These satirical exaggerations are a serious critique of poverty and social inequality yet CoverGirl and Net-A-Porter have completely ignored that. Instead of taking the critiques seriously they make campaigns for their clothes and makeup. What exactly does that tell us about the extreme nature of the fashion industry? Surely there is a problem with our society if the satire of the Hunger Games is being brought to reality.

1

YouTube is too white.

YouTube is a really amazing place, no doubt about that. The content we find on YouTube is so incredibly diverse from vlogs, parodies, collaborations, education, art, fanvideos etc etc. The creator can produce almost any content they want and find some sort of audience. The diversity of content is exactly what makes YouTube wonderful.  YouTube does have a problem though and that is representation. Out of the top 100 YouTube creators, can you believe that 90 of them are white? (source)That leaves 10 people to represent the rest of the world. In all of our racial complexity YouTube’s top content creators only account for 10% of the non-white world.

This is so incredibly problematic! It just turns me in to a “giant squid of anger” to ironically quote John Green, a white male YouTuber. Yes admittedly, the top 100 do not in any way account for the majority of the content available on YouTube but it does get those creators a lot of special attention and promotion. For example these top 100 are often on the featured page and just their ranking will attract people to their videos. Advertisers, the source of YouTube revenue, will also do promotions with these creators because of their ranking. (source) This means that it is very hard for people of color to settle into the YouTube business. Especially if they aren’t making revenue regardless of audience there will be little motivation to create content.

YouTube is the second most popular website with 100,000,000,000 page views and 790,000,000 unique users.  This can be seen in two ways. I see the lack of representation as exceptionally problematic because of its incredible popularity. YouTube has literally the largest audience and to not work hard for representation here is a problem. I can also see the point that because YouTube is decentralized it does not have enough power to control what people are viewing, like major TV is able to do.

YouTube does have the power to enable a more diverse generation of creators. Let’s take the example of the YouTube spaces in London, Los Angeles, and Tokyo. These YouTube spaces are places where creators can “make original videos, collaborate with other channels, share experiences, network, attend workshops, screenings and events, and get invaluable hands-on experience with industry-leading production equipment and resources.” In short these spaces are an amazing tool for creators to increase their success. YouTube has the power to set a fourth creator space in a city that has high diversity and also to go out and promote this space to minorities. YouTube does have the ability to make POC more successful on their website.  

Let me also address the argument that this representation isn’t that bad because YouTube has a majority white audience. The fact of the matter is that People of Color actually drive YouTube’s growth. Even if there is a mostly white audience People of Color are spending more time on YouTube and it is therefore crucial that people of color have a more equal representation on YouTube. (source)

0

Representation Supernodes

If you’re a newcomer to blogging in both reading and writing, like me,  than you probably still have a lot of trouble with the terms that more advanced bloggers use. In my layman’s definition a Supernode is just a really popular blog. To try and be a bit more complex Supernodes, in blogging, follow what is known as the “80/20 rule” where 80% of the attention being paid to blogs is with only 20% of the blogs out there, according to some of the reading in Net Smart: How To Thrive Online.  This basically means that for the most part a lot of us read the same blogs, which holds even more truth in interest based communities.

 

So then you might ask who are the Supernodes in the representation community? Well I might not have the full answer to that question but I can tell you of the two blogs who I see have the most influence and presence in the blogs I follow and audience I write for.

 

Velociriot and Olivia A. Cole are the blogs that produce most influential content on my blogroll. Velociriot’s content is centered around the critical reception of media and culture. She writes about TV and Film and also about popular politics and media reception of politics. Olivia A. Cole not only writes about representation but often writes poetry and advocates for social change, especially in the context of popular media. Check out her article on Chris Brown and a Nation of Raped Boys. The blogs also have a strong multi platform presence. Along with their blog they maintain twitter and facebook. They are often referenced in the blogosphere and influence the representation community beyond that exist beyond the it.

0

Wikipedia

Hey there everyone,

Let’s start out with some questions. Have you ever edited a wikipedia article? If you did was your change saved and did you like your experience? Let me know in the comments!

I’m very curious because I recently created a wikipedia account and began to edit.( By the way you don’t actually need an account to edit an article, although if you don’t have an account your IP address will show up in front of your edit on the history page.) I wanted to contribute to something I was informed on and still lacked information and analysis.

I thought I might contribute to Daenerys Targaryen’s page but it turns out that it is already incredibly detailed and if you search the game of thrones wikia then you will have even more detail. I kept looking for more characters that interested me but most of them already had substantial detail. I mean really detailed. If there’s one great thing about the wikipedia fandom community is that they give so much detail and expertise.

Looking back there were places where I could contribute for example Dany’s page could use a lot of analysis on feminism and her savior complex; however, I was too afraid of putting myself out there on such an established community. I instead looked to edit the We Can’t Stop article. As we all know We can’t stop is surrounded by a lot of controversy regarding race, class, and cultural appropriation so I was surprised when there was nothing substantial on these topics in the article. I created the a controversy section and added my input. If you’d like to see the edit here it is (x). Initially the edit was reverted by an instant filter for perceived “vandalism” this was most likely due to the words twerking and crotch in a couple of sentences but no big deal I just undid the revert.

I strongly believe that there are similar cases of this all throughout wikipedia. Where there are issues of representation that are ignored and with  Wikipedia begin one of the top 10 most visited websites in the world we are missing out on an opportunity to educate wikipedia readers on issues of representation.

So I encourage you to try to edit a wikipedia article! Create an account begin in your edit and keep tab of it in the history section after an hour and a day and see if your edit is reverted. If it is don’t give up it may be reverted by a person and if it is go their talk section and argue their point. It may also reverted by an instant filter you can undo those too. Remember to source your edit and let me know about your experience.

0

Prejudice in Media Design

 

Hello, everyone this time around I have a special collaborative post for all you readers. Tia, who runs a Graphic Design blog, and I have teamed up to bridge the subjects of our two blogs into one collaborative work. Our topic as you might have already guessed is prejudiced in media design.

Most Americans know that prejudice is limited but still very visible in today’s society and in the 20th century it was even more visible. Women’s rights activists fought for their rights as early as the 19th century, and civil rights didn’t begin until the 1960s, so before then there were a lot of offensive themes in various advertisements at the time. Below are some examples of media and advertisements portraying African Americans and women in a negative light.

Intel (2007) – This is an example of a poorly executed ad. It shows a white male standing upright while six identical black men are in a head start position. Perphaps it was for symmetry’s sake but the fact that this designer made the black men all identical just marginalizes black men’s capacity for individuality. Furthermore the ad relies and upholds the stereotype of black men’s superior athletic capacity, creating a false standard for black men. However, what really makes this ad problematic is that it shows black men bowing to their superior boss,the white male. The ad blew up on the Internet with backlash as it mocked the idea of slavery.  

Hoover (1950) – ‘She’ll be happier with a Hoover…’ This is a classic sign of the woman being strictly domestic. A housewife, maid, and nothing more. There are many other examples of this theme as the woman and a household appliance are a common example of sexism in 20th century advertisements. The problem with this design is the sexist language that makes it seem as if a woman will be happiest with a domestic product.

 Commercials, television programs, and films will tend to apply social class to only a certain kind of woman.Take a look at this design for Holli Would from the animated and live action film Cool world:

 

By taking a look at her clothes, makeup, and hairstyle we can see she has an has an overall wealthy looking appearance. She also has exaggerated curves and prominent sex appeal. There are two problems here first is the obvious hypersexualzation in Holli Woud’s design which creates unattainable beauty standards for women and unrealistic expectations for men. The second is the continual association of beauty and sexual appeal with wealth. As if only wealthy women can be beautiful. However, there is a contrast to this: she is drinking a bottle of beer. Beer is commonly shown as a working class drink. Usually working and homeless people drink beer, so this is an odd way to portray a somewhat wealthy woman. Perhaps it’s because she is also promiscuous  as if diverging from sexual purity is also diverging into a rougher lower class life style.  This is also problematic because promiscuity and alcohol consumption are seen as the lifestyle of the working class.

Finally, let’s talk about a good character design.

:

 

Tiana is a diverse character but for this post I would just like to concentrate on her class representation. Tiana is a truly great representation of the working class. Tiana is designed to be a hard working woman. She has two jobs; one as a waitress and another as a cook. She is saving up to open up her own restaurant. Tiana’s work is designed exceptionally well by contrast to her best friend Charlotte the daughter of the rich mayor. Charlotte gets anything she wants from her rich father and could probably have opened Tiana’s restaurant with the money she uses for her dress. In other words Tiana has two work twice as hard and long for anything she wants, this is an accurate representation of the failures of our class system. The actual design of Tiana is a bit disappointing, however. The problem is that there are no visible signs in her physical appearance that might indicate her hard working life.  As a working woman with two jobs you might think that she would have more muscles in her arms or bags under her eyes. Anything that shows that she has to work harder than others.

 

It is well known that media design can range from persuasion, advertising, entertainment etc but things begin to get problematic when these designs incorporate prejudice. Therefore the designer has a burden to be aware and educated of the representations they might be portraying.